Retinol
why not to use it ?
by john Hamilton 25 yrs {biogerontolgist & Cell Research Scientist }
Journalists and beauty therapists talk about retinol a lot, yet know zero about its long term damage.
{In August 2012 the National Toxicology Program of the US National Institutes of Health published a report, which examined the photocarcinogenic effect. It found that the inclusion of these compounds in the cream increased the number of tumors} It removes the surface skin cells, exposing new skin cells too early thus increasing the risk of skin cancer; used continuously, it has been shown to also cause premature skin ageing, hypersensitivity, and redness or dryness. Still think you should use it?
What's better at anti ageing and does not cause cell damage?
Natural plant extracts and oils contain high levels of collagen-building protein as well as powerful antioxidants that prevent at least 80% of skin cell ageing and keep cells youthful by preventing and repairing damage to the skin cells, collagen, fibres, and elastin's
But do our naturals work? Read some of the comments from users; there are thousands of them next to our product descriptions...and here is a photo of Karen, a co-founder, at 67 years old this year—no retinol, just natural oils. Don't be taken in by the hype try 100% naturals and see what happens in 24 hours. Yes, just 24 hours. No other range of skincare can do this.
It's really sad that some people are taken in by all the bull of the big skincare companies. We hear from hundreds of people daily who have had a bad experience of using retinol Don't let yourself be one of them..
and if you think that its safe because its on the market ....well fool you